- Audience 1st
- Posts
- 5 Mindset Shifts Security Teams Must Adopt to Master Multi-Cloud Security
5 Mindset Shifts Security Teams Must Adopt to Master Multi-Cloud Security
Every time I talk to security leaders about multi-cloud, I hear the same frustrations. It’s complex. It’s overwhelming. It’s messy. But the real problem? It’s not just the technology - it’s how security teams think about it.

This episode is presented together with
Every time I talk to security leaders about multi-cloud, I hear the same frustrations.
It’s complex. It’s overwhelming. It’s messy.
But the real problem?
It’s not just the technology - it’s how security teams think about it.
Companies are scrambling to secure AWS, Azure, GCP, and on-prem environments all at once.
But instead of stepping back and rethinking their approach, they’re dragging legacy security models into a cloud-first world - and it’s just not working.
So I sat down with Gal Yosef, Head of Product Management for the Americas at AlgoSec, on the Audience 1st Podcast to figure out what’s really going wrong.
We dug into:
The outdated security mindsets that are holding teams back
How to bridge the silos between network and cloud security teams
How large enterprises maintain efficiency and ROI in multi-cloud security
Why security must be continuous and automated - not a static, manual process
Let’s go.
Before we dive in, don’t forget to subscribe to join 1700+ cybersecurity marketers and sales pros mastering customer research. You’ll get notified whenever a new episode and buyer insights summary drops.
Mindset Shift #1: From "Castle and Moat" to "Distributed Trust"
Old Mindset: Castle and Moat | New Mindset: Distributed Trust |
Perimeter security protects the network edge | Security follows applications, users, and data |
Firewalls and VPNs define the "inside" and "outside" | No single perimeter - security is dynamic |
Static rules for access control | Identity-based, adaptive security policies |
Security is focused on the network | Security is embedded into applications and workloads |
For years, security was all about the perimeter.
The network edge was the line in the sand - inside was safe, outside was dangerous. Organizations built firewalls, VPNs, and segmentation rules to keep the bad guys out.
That made sense in a world where applications and data stayed inside the corporate data center.
But today? That world is gone.
Multi-cloud shattered the perimeter.
Workloads are spinning up across AWS, Azure, GCP, SaaS platforms, and hybrid environments - moving dynamically as organizations scale.
If security teams keep clinging to the "castle and moat" mindset, they’re leaving the real assets - applications and identities - exposed.
"It's very clear that organizations are already out there in the cloud, fully onboarded. They’re running multi-cloud environments - leveraging AWS, Azure, GCP, and others."
The shift to Distributed Trust means security has to follow the workload, user, and data - no matter where they are.
Instead of focusing on securing infrastructure, organizations need to enforce zero-trust principles across multi-cloud environments.
Security must be workload-centric, not infrastructure-centric.
Policies should follow applications dynamically across environments.
Trust must be continuously validated - never assumed.
If your security strategy is still perimeter-based, it’s only a matter of time before something critical falls through the cracks.
Mindset Shift #2: From "Departmental Silos" to "Cross-Functional Collaboration"
Old Mindset: Departmental Silos | New Mindset: Cross-Functional Collaboration |
Network and cloud security teams operate separately | Unified security policies across network and cloud |
Network teams think in firewalls; cloud teams think in security groups | Shared security framework with a common language |
Each team enforces policies independently | Cross-team collaboration to align security goals |
No visibility into each other's controls | Centralized visibility across all environments |
One of the biggest blockers to securing multi-cloud isn’t the tech - it’s how security teams are structured.
Traditionally, network security and cloud security have been completely separate domains.
Network security teams focus on firewalls, segmentation, and on-prem controls.
Cloud security teams work with IAM, security groups, and workload policies.
"These are two different teams. One comes from the traditional firewalls world - Palo Alto, Check Point, Fortinet - handling on-prem network security. The other team is deep in cloud security, managing security groups, policies, and cloud-native controls."
The problem? They don’t speak the same language.
Because these teams weren’t built to work together, security policies are getting misconfigured, fragmented, and exploited.
Attackers aren’t breaking in - they’re slipping through the cracks security teams accidentally created.
"Those are different languages that now need to collaborate and communicate between each other. You need to be able to build a structure where it's all working together."
Security leaders need to tear down the walls between network and cloud security.
Network and cloud security teams need to work together - not separately.
Security policies should be unified across cloud and on-prem environments.
Organizations need a shared security framework - one that bridges legacy and cloud-native systems.
If security teams keep operating in silos, misconfigurations and blind spots will only grow.
Mindset Shift #3: From "Periodic Checks" to "Continuous, Automated Enforcement"
Old Mindset: Periodic Checks | New Mindset: Continuous, Automated Enforcement |
Security reviews happen quarterly or annually | Security is enforced in real time |
Manual policy enforcement | Automated policy enforcement across environments |
Compliance is reactive | Compliance is proactively monitored and adjusted |
Misconfigurations fixed after detection | Issues prevented before they become threats |
Most security teams are stuck in a reactive model.
Security audits happen quarterly.
Firewall rule reviews happen once a year.
Cloud misconfigurations are fixed only after they become a problem.
That approach made sense in an on-prem world where things changed slowly.
But in the cloud?
Workloads spin up in seconds.
Policies shift in real time.
And threats are evolving faster than ever.
"You want a single orchestration platform that can enforce security policies across all cloud providers, so security teams aren’t managing everything separately."
The only way to keep up is to shift from manual policy enforcement to continuous, automated enforcement.
Security policies should be built into cloud automation workflows.
Misconfigurations should be detected and remediated in real-time.
Compliance should be proactively monitored - not just checked during audits.
If your security team is still reacting instead of preventing, you’re already behind.
Mindset Shift #4: From "Security as a Gatekeeper" to "Security as a Business Enabler"
Old Mindset: Security as a Gatekeeper | New Mindset: Security as a Business Enabler |
Security blocks fast-moving development teams | Security integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows |
Security policies are rigid and inflexible | Guardrails provide flexibility while maintaining control |
Lengthy approval processes slow down innovation | Security enables safe, rapid cloud adoption |
Developers avoid security teams to move faster | Developers work with security to build safer applications |
Security leaders love to talk about risk, but here’s the harsh reality is that:
If security slows the business down, the business will find a way around it.
Security teams love controls. But developers?
They need to move fast. And if security creates too much friction, security policies won’t get followed - they’ll get bypassed.
"You want to make sure that you have business continuity. Downtime is the enemy - because downtime means the end user is impacted. And that's bad for business."
Security leaders need to stop thinking of themselves as blockers and start thinking like enablers.
Security needs to be built into DevOps workflows - not treated as a separate process.
Security should provide guardrails - not roadblocks.
The goal isn’t to slow the business down - it’s to enable it to move securely.
If security is seen as a bottleneck, it will get ignored - and that’s where the real risk begins.
Mindset Shift #5: From "One-Size-Fits-All Policies" to "Flexible Guardrails by Business Unit"
Old Mindset: One-Size-Fits-All Policies | New Mindset: Flexible Guardrails by Business Unit |
Uniform security policies applied across all teams | Security policies are tailored to each business unit’s needs |
Business units must conform to rigid security standards | Security adapts based on risk profile and compliance needs |
One security model for all environments | Security models vary based on the application and workload |
Security is a barrier to productivity | Security enables business units to move fast, securely |
Security isn’t one-size-fits-all.
Different business units have different risks, different cloud needs, and different compliance requirements.
But a lot of security teams treat every department the same.
They apply rigid, organization-wide policies that don’t account for the reality of how teams actually work.
“They almost look at their BUs as their customers. They give them flexibility to move fast, but everything must be within the policy set by corporate security, compliance, and the CISO.”
Instead of forcing a single policy on every business unit, security leaders should be giving teams secure, flexible guardrails that allow them to operate within safe boundaries.
Business units should have the flexibility to operate securely without roadblocks.
Security guardrails should balance speed and compliance.
Security should adapt to each unit’s specific risk profile.
Security Needs to Evolve - Or Be Left Behind
The old ways of thinking about security don’t work in multi-cloud environments.
It’s time for a fundamental shift - one that prioritizes distributed trust, collaboration, automation, and business enablement.
If security doesn’t evolve, organizations will either be left vulnerable - or left behind.
If you want to hear more from Gal Yosef, check out the full episode of Audience 1st.
And if you’re struggling with multi-cloud security at scale, talk to AlgoSec's team here.
Until next time,
Dani
Excited to collaborate? Let’s make it happen!
Check out our sponsorship details to connect with real security practitioners and showcase your brand to an engaged community of cybersecurity decision-makers giving and seeking real buyer insights.
Reply